Geek Swagger.
Tech News
Motorola Atrix: The All-In-One Mobile Powerhouse
Jan 26th
Android-based phones and tablets seemed to dominate the discussion during CES this year, and in particular Motorola had an awesome show. Not only did they launch the most substantial iPad competitor in the Xoom tablet, but they also had some interesting new phones on display as well. The one that impressed me the most was the Motorola Atrix 4G, not only because of its hardware specs, but some really cool things they're doing with dock support.
Beefy Specs
As I mentioned Motorola has rolled some cool features into the Atrix, some of which involve a PC-style computing experience, so they need to have the hardware to power that functionality. To start off the phone uses a Tegra 2 dual core processor which is significant. It's a chip developed by Nvidia that is the world's first multi-core CPU crafted with mobile devices in mind. They've also packed in a gigabyte of RAM, a front-facing camera and a fingerprint reader. That's the boring part though - things get interesting when you take a look at some of the accessories and integrated software features, most-importantly the Webtop OS.
Webtop OS
Where the Atrix really shines is when you see it seamlessly transition into a desktop or laptop computer by simply inserting it into one of its docks. Webtop is an operating system that runs on the phone to give you desktop-like functionality from a device only 4" in size. There are two implementations of the custom Atrix dock - one that allows you to hook up an external display and one that's integrated right into an inexpensive laptop enclosure. The easiest way to understand how Webtop works is to see it in action, and the folks from Engadget have put together an awesome hands-on video that certainly gets the point across.
Can you say perfect business and travel device? Given the tiny stature of the laptop dock especially I can imagine using the Atrix with Webtop anytime I met with clients or whenever I needed to fire off emails in the car. There's no wonder why this phone was Engadget's best of CES!
Some Concerns
I would happily trade my current phone in for the Atrix, but I am somewat concerned about the fact that getting the most out of Webtop OS requires an investment beyond just buying the phone and paying the contract fees. Although not required and certainly affordable in its own right, the 11.6" laptop dock is rumored to cost $150 when it's available for purchase later this year. I tend to get a new phone every year or so, and therefore the prospect of paying roughly $350 (assuming the Atrix is about $199 with a contract) for a device I won't have in a year is somewhat troubling. Hopefully Motorola will continue to make Atrix phones without changing the form factor of the dock so that you don't have to re-buy hardware.
There's also the whole AT&T exclusivity thing. I'm not a fan. Motorola did announce a Verizon-based phone that uses the Tegra 2 chip called the Droid Bionic, but it only has half the RAM and there hasn't been a whisper about Webtop OS integration. That said I'm proud of Motorola for becoming the premiere Android device developer in the market by building on the success they began with the Droid and Droid X.
Facebook integrates with Bing – Smart move or desperate grasp at relevancy?
Oct 14th
While I was watching this week's Bing and Facebook announcement, where-in the folks from each company debuted the fruit of their partnership, I couldn't help but think it was a very smart move by both companies. First off, Bing benefits because of the popularity of Facebook. Facebook is arguably the second most dominant platform or website on the internet next to Google's myriad of offerings, so what better way for Microsoft to up the ante then by courting them? Additionally, Facebook gets to dip into Microsoft's deep pockets without losing their namesake. Win-win, right?
It can be, that's for sure, but my biggest concern is that this partnership will go unnoticed. The ability to find socially generated recommendations while searching Bing is a huge feature, one that I think could attract a lot of new users to Microsoft's search engine. I mean let's be honest here, an incredible amount of people are using (addicted?) to Facebook, so any online tool that helps them access their friends in an additional way should be fairly successful. Add to that the fact that Bing serves results whenever a user searches with Facebook's search box and you'd assume that Bing's visibility should skyrocket.
Still I'll go back to my main issue: do a lot of folks know about this? I did a few searches on Facebook just now and unless you search with an incredibly obscure query the Bing results fall below the fold of the page. That's significant, especially since my display is at a fairly high resolution. Additionally, I don't really think the general public will think to go to Bing just to check out the Facebook integration. Sure, there's been a press conference and some buzz around the net but does average Joe computer user know about this week's announcement?
In order for this partnership to be a success Microsoft must bare the burden of advertising the new features. They've done a pretty good job with their TV campaigns that regard search overload (you may have seen them, the ones with normal people blurting out nonsense search queries in their day-to-day lives), so they need to follow up with more ads that focus on the new social side of Bing. More importantly, they have to make sure that whatever marketing they do is Facebook heavy! Don't be afraid to use that big blue Facebook logo as much as possible.
People love Facebook. If they know your product plays nice with their favorite website they'll probably give it a try.
Apple’s iPad – It’s all about the apps.
Jan 30th

I've had some time to digest Apple's announcement of the iPad this Wednesday, and despite being confused and unsure at first I think I've come around on it. Â Is the iPad perfect? Â No. Â Is it a device you need? Â No more than you "need" an Amazon Kindle. Â It's a luxury device that'll fill some use cases for you and probably make your life a little more convenient, but certainly not a necessity.
There has been a lot of commotion about the iPad being "just a big iPod Touch." Â I disagree with that sentiment completely, for a couple of reasons. Â First, it's about the user experience. Â What's the most-obvious difference between the iPod Touch and iPad? Â The display size, of course. Â Because the display for these touch devices doubles as the user input interface, it means developers can do a hell of a lot more with the software they create on the iPad. Â I think it'll be the first device to truly recognize the full potential and yes, I'll admit it, "cool factor" of multitouch. Â Sure I can do some multitouch functions on my iPhone, but usually only to zoom in or zoom out on an object. Â Imagine the possibilities of the iPad's nearly 10" of screen real estate, particularly when you can set it down on the table or in your lap and have two free hands with which to manipulate the on-screen information.

The second major difference is the horsepower. Â My current smartphone is the iPhone 3GS, which has a ARM processor clocked at 600mhz by default and only 256MB of memory. Â The iPad on the other hand, has a 1ghz processor and rumored 1GB of RAM. Â That means that the applications that are being developed for it will have a much wider range of capabilities and a richer user experience. Â While watching Apple's keynote it wasn't until Scott Forstall brought developers up on stage to show their iPad apps, not to mention when Phil Schiller did the iWork demonstration, that I began to truly understand the amazing amount of potential this device has. Â Compare the iPad right now to where the iPhone was when it launched: there are very few native applications and those that do exist were created by Apple. Â The one thing that the iPad has going for it over the iPhone though, is that we already have an SDK for the device before it's even released. Â How long did it take Apple to get the iPhone SDK out there?

I'll be the first to admit that I think the way they've chosen to integrate iPhone apps into the iPad is a little cheesy. Â You can either run them in a native mode, which displays them in a tiny black box in the middle of your 9.5" display, or you can use "pixel-double" to expand them to fit the screen. Â Pixel-double might be good for apps that are predominantly text or image-based, but I have a feeling that there's going to be significant graphical degradation with video playback and games. Â With all that said though, iPhone apps on the iPad are not what users should be excited for. Â Software developed with the iPad in mind will truly make the device sing, and I think it'll be the best media-consumption device we've seen so far.
Plus you can't read ibooks on your iPod Touch, you illiterate brigand!
My monthly post.
Nov 7th
It seems like I've fallen off with posting lately. Â Honestly, I feel that talking about most of the things I would normally talk about is kind of a waste of time because there's a lot of other (better) ways to keep up on what's hot in the tech industry. Â First and foremost I'd recommend listening to as many TWiT netcasts as possible. Â The most obvious of the bunch would be itself, but I'd also recommend taking a look at and while you're there. Â Those are my primary sources for tech news.
On the gaming side of things I'd recommend the usuals. Â My favorite of the bunch is the , the hosts of which not only review the news from the past week but also provide an often-times hysterical delivery. Â My second standby when it comes to gaming podcasts would have to be , previously the 1UP Yours podcast with Garnett Lee. Â Garnett has since moved on to bigger and better things at Gamefly but David Ellis has done a great job in his stead.
The latest additions to my repertoire are CheapyD's and by Area 5, a band of 1UP alumnus. Â The CAGcast (short for , a website dedicated to gaming deals) is probably the most laid-back of the bunch and, to be honest, I mostly listen to it for CheapyD and Wombat's off-topic banter. Â CO-OP on the other hand is a masterfully-produced Revision 3 video show that reviews the past week's releases.
So, now that I've more-or-less put myself out of a job by sharing all of my sources for information, what can I offer? Â How about a Canibus song (best rapper alive):
Google Voice
Oct 3rd
I was fortunate enough to get invites to both and this week, but for now I’m going to stick with discussing Google Voice. This is mostly because nobody I know has Google Wave yet and, for a product that’s about collaboration with other people, it makes it hard to form an educated opinion about its usefulness.
Google Voice is a new service from Google which lets you link multiple phone numbers (home phone, work phone, mobile, etc.) to one new number of your choosing, as long as it’s available. You can search for numbers via keyword (for example your name), area code or zip code. Once you’ve chosen your new number all you have to do is link your pre-existing numbers to that one and you’ll have access to the host of cool features that Google Voice provides.
The most obvious feature Google Voice provides is call forwarding. Using the site’s settings you can set Google Voice to forward calls and messages to one of your various phones automatically. For example, you could set your work phone to only receive Google Voice calls between 9 and 5 on weekdays, or your home phone to only receive calls on weekends. You can even setup and manage certain groups of contacts and set the default phone for each – for example, if you want to direct work calls to your mobile phone you can do that.
The next feature I like is getting Google into some hot water with carriers – free SMS messaging. From the Google Voice website you can send text messages to any phone, for free. Many people have presumed that this feature alone is why the Google Voice application was denied from Apple’s App Store. You can be sure that AT&T wasn’t too excited about the idea.
One of the best features you get with Google Voice is the purest form of free visual voicemail I’ve ever seen. Voicemails sent to your Google Voice account are automatically transcribed to text and forwarded to the Google Voice website where you have an inbox for all incoming messages. The transcriptions are surprisingly accurate, but you can also playback the message from the website if there are a few missed words. As you would expect, from your Google Voice inbox you can read incoming messages as though you were reading email from your Gmail inbox. You can search for messages, leave notes to yourself and even add stars to important messages so you can come back to them later.
All said I think Google Voice is an excellent service. I can only hope that someone at Apple or AT&T decides to let the application through to the App Store. If not, you can bet that Google will work on a mobile web version of Google Voice like they’ve done with most of their other services, and we’ll get access to it anyways.
Snow Leopard on Friday
Aug 24th
After a bunch of speculation the release date for Apple's OS X Snow Leopard is confirmed - August 28th, this Friday. That had been the rumor going around and yet again it proved to be true.
There really isn't much else to be said. If you have Leopard on your machine and you're looking to upgrade, you can get your copy of Snow Leopard for $29. Even better, if you've bought a Mac anytime between now and last June, you can get your upgrade copy for just $9.95.
Because I bought my Macbook Pro in June I preordered my copy way back then, so I should have it on Friday. Expect a post about how the update goes.
Subscribe to Jason Calacanis’s Newsletter
Aug 10th
The headline pretty much says it all. Â Jason Calacanis, founder of Mahalo.com, puts out an extremely intriguing newsletter every now and again that's totally free. Â Who is Jason? Â Well, he's basically a successful tech entrepreneur who is business-minded but doesn't neglect the inner geek. Â You might have seen or heard him on the This Week In Tech podcast, which he participates in from time to time.
I have to admit, at first glance Mr. Calacanis might rub people the wrong way. Â His brash manner and uninhibited honesty is a departure from the norm, but that's also the reason he's garnered my respect. Â That's what inspired me to subscribe to his newsletter when I first heard about it a few months ago. Â That being said I tended to ignore it when it landed in my inbox for the first few times. Â That has changed.
A couple weeks ago Jason sent out his now famous email about the Microsoft/Yahoo partnership. Â I won't go into details because they're readily available online, most notably , but it was the first newsletter that I took the time to read. Â He presented a well-written argument which, if nothing else, inspired me to think a lot more about the matter. Â He's since followed up with emails about Apple and their flight from openness in regards to the iPhone, each equally if not more thought-provoking than the "seppuku" note. Â Calacanis provides the perfect mixture of equal parts experience and opinion that stimulates great discussion, and he doesn't shy away from readers replying to his comments (in fact he has shared some of them in follow-up newsletters).
So, with that said, hit up and subscribe right away. Â Even if you don't agree with everything he writes about it's a great way to keep in the loop and stimulate thinking. Â In the meantime I'll steadfastly await that next [Jason] subject line to drop into my inbox.
Google’s Eric Schmidt Resigns from Apple Board of Directors
Aug 3rd
This is a very interesting development given very recent conflicts between Google and Apple/AT&T. Â Sure, Steve Jobs has stated that Eric's resignation was a mutual decision made by both companies because Google's on is becoming a conflict of interest. Â Still, Android has been out for some time, so why now?
One of the biggest stories last week was Apple's denial of the application on the iTunes app store. Â The dispute has since been consumed by the gaze of the FCC to determine if this choice was made by AT&T moreso than Apple, or if AT&T in any way influences the content found on the App Store. Â If that's the case, as it may very well be, the ruling could be important for a couple reasons.
- Consumers have one more reason to detest AT&T
- It gives no logical support for the claim that the denial of Google applications has anything to do with Schmidt's descent from the board
- Consumers have one more reason to dete....oh, I already said that one
Honestly though it doesn't sound like Apple's style to bend to the will of AT&T. Â They love their products enough to say something to the affect of "Listen, we have a product that has made you millions, you think this app conflicts with your service then tough cookies - we're working on a Verizon version of the iPhone anyways." Â I'm getting off-track here.
Does this departure setup a feud between Apple and Google? Â The two companies have seemed almost philosophically aligned for some time now, and most pundits don't really consider Android or what we know of Chrome OS as major threats in their individual markets (phone and PC operating systems). Â All this time it has been Microsoft who has been desperately trying to compete with the big G, and just when it seems that they're making a solid go of it the focus might be shifting towards an Apple/Google main event instead.
There is one area in which the philosophies of Apple and Google conflict, however. Â Openness. Â It's been proclaimed that this might be the achilles heel of Apple. Â Google always happily opens up their projects to developers while Apple severely shies away from such behavior. Â Sure, the iTunes App Store is extremely successful, but the only complaint we seem to hear about weekly is that certain apps get shot down for seemingly silly reasons, and of course Apple's proprietary take on their hardware and software is always criticized. Â If Apple had the market share Windows does, they'd have one of the worst monopolies we've ever seen.
The only thing we could possibly say Google has a monopoly on is the search engine market, but with Bing approaching 10%+ market share that's not as much of a compelling case.
Have 2 hours to kill? Want to know more about Google Wave?
Jul 23rd
If you answered yes to these two questions I have a video just for you! Â The video below weighs in at an impressive 120 minutes, and is (from what I can tell after watching the first 5) a thorough demonstration of Google Wave and its API.
Google Wave
May 28th
I'm not sure what to make of Google Wave just yet. It seems to me like it's a collaboration tool more than anything - you'll be able to share and create documents with rich text and multimedia support, and these projects are updated real time to allow easy communication between participants. Still, there is Google inbox, chat and Picasa integration, and it's been said that this is Google's response to Twitter. Based on the screenshots it looks like it'll be a good way to communicate with friends, but the description makes Wave sound like something entirely different. All I know is that I like the user interface, and I'm happy it's open to developers.
You can throw your name into the hat to try Google Wave as soon as it becomes available at the link below.