Geek Swagger.
Posts tagged Pure Digital
Flip Mino HD review
Jan 2nd
Here's my more formal review of the Flip Mino HD, in video form of course. Check out my previous post by clicking here if you'd like to see the video quality.
Flip Mino HD Review Part 1
Flip Mino HD Review Part 2
Flip Mino HD – Down By The Bay
Jan 1st
Happy new year! I know we agreed not to get each other any gifts this year, but I just couldn't help picking up this beautiful HD video for you, my dearest reader. Remember to click the HD button on the right after you start the video to see it in true high definition. Enjoy!
from on .
I wish you all the best in the new year!
To HD or not to (Flip Mino) HD, that is the question
Dec 23rd
I've been thinking about getting a Flip Video camcorder for a while now, pretty much ever since I started uploading videos to YouTube. It seems to be the perfect mobile pocket recorder, a device I could take with me anywhere to record a quick little something. When their Mino version came out the purchase became a necessity. The thing is just too damn small and sexy to not own. Then, to add to the heartache, the folks at Pure Digital put out an HD version of the thing. What's a geek to do?
The cool thing about the normal Flip Mino is that it's relatively cheap. For the 2GB (60 minutes of video) version you pay around $160. Not bad at all. It's also got around 4 hours of battery life, slightly older editing software, and a smaller CMOS sensor. The HD version is practically identical, but has 4GB of memory (also 60 minutes, but 60 minutes of HD video) and the battery life is cut in half. Now, the battery life doesn't bother me. If I can only record 60 minutes of video at a time does it really matter if my battery lasts 2 hours instead of 4? The biggest issue is that the Mino HD can cost as much as $230, and as you approach the $300 mark you might be better off picking up a higher-quality camcorder or a digital camera which shoots video.
So you might be asking yourself why even bother with the HD? Well, as I mentioned I like to put my videos on YouTube. YouTube has recently moved to a widescreen format, allowing HD-quality video uploads. Unfortunately the original Mino doesn't have a setting for recording in widescreen and the HD does, so unless you're into black bars and low-quality video, the HD is the way to go. That's the only difference between the two, really. As the names suggest the Mino HD is meant for taking HD video and the Mino is not.
So which is better? Is it worth ponying up an extra $60 for widescreen and 1280x720 resolution video, or should you save some cash and go with 4:3 with a resolution of 640x480? I'm leaning towards the former. The way I see it, no one has ever wished their camcorder shot lower-quality video. It might be worth the extra investment now so that I don't end up spending money on another device down the road.
Now Playing:
Korpiklaani - Spring Dance
Midnight Club: Los Angeles,
